23 February 2023





Climate Change hasn't changed since 2006



Those of us young enough remember the 2000 presidential election might be triggered by the phrase "hanging chads." That presidential election loss was almost as disturbing as the 2020 election loss except that once the tallies were made, Gore did not try to “find votes” in Florida. Although the U.S. lost its best next president, the environmental movement gained a strong voice for change, one outcome of which was the movie, "An Inconvenient Truth." Climate change hasn't changed (that is, it hasn't gotten any better) since 2006 when the movie was made.





In my voting lifetime, I have only seen Democrats put environmental and health issues at the forefront of their political platforms. Meanwhile Republicans, who consistently tout family and moral values, prefer to challenge environmentalists to support their single priority of maintaining the wealth (and ultimately political power) of people in their strata.


Politicians have always understood the science. Climate science has certainly been studied and published enough. Gore made a good point when he said that if politicians acknowledge and recognize it, then they have to do something about it. Legislate, allocate funding and spend money on it. I was really amazed, but not surprised, at the efforts made in suppressing the truth about climate change, efforts that prevented solving the problem in the last century, and that have continued in this one. When Gore lost the presidential election, his political environmental fight was sidelined.


At the root of their unwillingness to address climate change, the politicians who scoff at preventing and correcting environmental damage value their wealth more than they value the health of the Earth. They are short-term thinkers, the same as the corporate leaders who focus on showing quarterly profits, focusing much less on the long-term well-being of the business, and the people who work for them. Politicians focus on the current fiscal year and the contributions they can sweep in, and about the next fiscal year when they need to spend those campaign funds to get reelected. They do grasp the connection that trees, plants, animals, and insects to our survival but to act on it would be to jeopardize their positions if they upset their donors—primarily the wealthy owners and managers of the corporations (the aforementioned short-term thinkers).


Unfortunately, the 50% will only begin to care enough to do something when it affects them personally—and by personally, I really mean financially. Others, the less wealthy, are feeling the effects through disasters. The video mentioned Japan’s typhoons in 2004 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Hurricane Katrina was frightening because of the number of people that were displaced and the delay of the Republican-led administration to mount a FEMA response. It was particularly upsetting to see American people---primarily Black American people---suffering in New Orleans. Prior to that year, I was accustomed to seeing victims of natural disasters only in other countries.





With all the storms, floods, droughts and fires happening, all of us are being touched in some way, directly or indirectly. Homeowner’s insurance premiums are ridiculously high as the insurers are trying to cover their losses and maximize their profit margins, while many people must work more to cover the premiums as well as the soaring costs of basic goods and services.


In her New York Times article, Coral Davenport wrote that in Texas, a climate denying state, farmers reported losses of 74% of their planted cotton crops, close to 6 million acres, because of drought. But with USDA crop insurance, and government subsidies, the farmers’ wealth is intact. For the rest of us without federal assistance, working more to combat rising prices cycle is a losing battle as long the root cause of the problem is unsolved. Although hurricanes and floods are considered natural disasters, climate change is an ongoing, unnatural human-led disaster. It’s like a fire that is burning slowly (but it’s starting to pick up with the wind!) so that no one has raised a seven-alarm response to it. What’s worse, the wealthy believe that engineers can buy or build something to correct the damages made, or that they can buy their way out of it. We see how well that's working out.